John Μ. King

49 papers receiving 823 citations

Peers

John Μ. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Equine 78
  • Small Animals 159
  • Parasitology 66
  • Animal Science and Zoology 76
  • Microbiology 44
Replace Peter Graham with:
Peter Graham United Kingdom
Roger G. Breeze United States
Rebecca Kirby United States
J. Baker United Kingdom
Erik J. Olson United States
Stevens Ce United States
Eric Weaver United States
Rajiv Juneja India
J. C. Woodard United States
Peter Cowen United States
John Μ. King relative to Peter Graham United Kingdom Peter Graham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Peter Graham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Μ. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Μ. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Μ. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Μ. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Μ. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Μ. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Μ. King. The network helps show where John Μ. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Μ. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Μ. King Line = papers co-authored together John Μ. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199381
2
Livestock water needs in pastoral Africa in relation to climate and forage
198379
3 199163
4 199055
5 198055
6 199247
7 197144
8 199443
9 199134
10
THE NECROPSY BOOK: A Guide for Veterinary Students, Residents, Clinicians, Pathologists, and Biological Researchers
201427
11 199327
12 196626
13 201824
14 198520
15 199120
16 198420
17 199219
18 200018
19 200518
20 198016

About John Μ. King

John Μ. King is a scholar working on Small Animals, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ecology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 915 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (4 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (4 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (4 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (3 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (78 citations), Small Animals (159 citations), Parasitology (66 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (76 citations) and Microbiology (44 citations). John Μ. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Stephen G. Dill, William C. Rebhun, Hollis N. Erb, Wayne I. Anderson, Louis Guida, Mary A. Crawford, Lois Roth, Lance F. Karcher, Richard Payne and Francis A. Kallfelz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation and Anti-Cancer Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact