John Ladd

1.5k citations
41 papers · 627 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John Ladd

35 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

John Ladd
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Information Systems and Management 115
  • Philosophy 119
  • Political Science and International Relations 145
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 108
  • Law 49
Replace Kurt Baier with:
Kurt Baier United States
Karl‐Otto Apel Germany
David M. Rasmussen United States
G. Matthew Bonham United States
J. B. Schneewind United States
Patrick Lee Plaisance United States
Leo Rauch United Kingdom
Mark S. Frankel United States
George Watson United States
James B. Lemert United States
John Ladd relative to Kurt Baier United States Kurt Baier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kurt Baier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Ladd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Ladd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ladd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ladd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Ladd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ladd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ladd. The network helps show where John Ladd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John Ladd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Ladd Line = papers co-authored together John Ladd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966197
2 1970105
3 195741
4
Metaphysical Elements of Justice Part I of the Metaphysics of Morals
199936
5 198229
6
Computers and moral responsibility: a framework for an ethical analysis
199126
7 195726
8 199124
9 198720
10 198419
11 198211
12 199711
13 19809
14 19557
15 19527
16 20176
17 20205
18 19975
19 19535
20 19524

About John Ladd

John Ladd is a scholar working on Philosophy, Organic Chemistry, Political Science and International Relations, Artificial Intelligence and Safety Research, having authored 41 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (1 paper), Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (1 paper), Computational Physics and Python Applications (1 paper), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (115 citations), Philosophy (119 citations), Political Science and International Relations (145 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (108 citations) and Law (49 citations). John Ladd has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Immanuel Kant, Edwin W. Tucker, Marvin K. Opler, Gwynne Nettler, Philip George, A. M. Macbeath, M. Cohen, Jessica P. Otis, Scott Weingart and Christopher Warren. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Monist and Teaching Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact