John Grieve

784 citations
14 papers · 76 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

John Grieve

14 papers receiving 68 citations

Peers

John Grieve
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Political Science and International Relations 26
  • General Decision Sciences 2
  • Sociology and Political Science 39
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7
  • Social Psychology 12
Replace Daniel G. Williams with:
Daniel G. Williams United States
M. Joel Voss United States
Stéphane Leroy France
Artur Bogner Germany
Raymond H. Wheeler United States
Matej Hruška Slovakia
Bryan McCann
Guido Bonsaver United Kingdom
Charles Hatfield United States
Alberto López Ortega Netherlands
John Grieve relative to Daniel G. Williams United States Daniel G. Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel G. Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Grieve

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Grieve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Grieve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Grieve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Grieve

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Grieve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Grieve. The network helps show where John Grieve may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside John Grieve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Grieve Line = papers co-authored together John Grieve links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200716
2 20089
3 20118
4
Developments in UK Criminal Intelligence
20097
5 20096
6 20076
7
The handbook of intelligent policing: consilience, crime control, and community safety
20085
8
A Democratic Licence to Operate: Report of the Independent Surveillance Review
20155
9 20095
10
Reviewing the reviewers: a tool to aid homicide reviews
20083
11
Reviewing the reviewers the review of homicides in the United Kingdom
20102
12 20132
13 20191
14 20091

About John Grieve

John Grieve is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Information Systems, Ocean Engineering and Surgery, having authored 14 papers that have together received 76 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (2 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (2 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (2 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Oil and Gas Production Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (26 citations), General Decision Sciences (2 citations), Sociology and Political Science (39 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (7 citations) and Social Psychology (12 citations). John Grieve has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and British Virgin Islands. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Savage, Rebecca Milne, Dylan Jones, Salim Taoutaou, Nathan C. Hall, Carlo Ricci, Jay R. Rooker, David Omand, Janet M. Scarlett and Ian Walden. Their work appears in journals such as Criminology & Criminal Justice, Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice, Safer Communities, AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) and Oxford University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact