John Girling

1.0k citations
57 papers · 486 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Girling

48 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

John Girling
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Political Science and International Relations 296
  • Sociology and Political Science 329
  • Anthropology 50
  • Development 18
  • Public Administration 15
Replace Ruth McVey with:
Ruth McVey Mexico
Howard Handelman United States
Barry Carr Australia
Robert L. Hardgrave United States
G. HAINSWORTH Canada
Leonard Binder United States
Fred R. von der Mehden United States
Jonathan W. Zophy United States
David Wurfel Canada
Keith R. Legg United States
John Girling relative to Ruth McVey Mexico Ruth McVey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ruth McVey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Girling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Girling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Girling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Girling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Girling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Girling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Girling. The network helps show where John Girling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside John Girling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Girling Line = papers co-authored together John Girling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200286
2 199974
3 198245
4 198835
5 197028
6 197721
7 199614
8 199812
9 198412
10 19719
11 19718
12 19778
13 19828
14 19888
15
Social Movements and Symbolic Power: Radicalism, Reform and the Trial of Democracy in France
20048
16 19697
17 19807
18 19876
19 19776
20 19716

About John Girling

John Girling is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Development, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (23 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (6 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (5 papers), Cambodian History and Society (4 papers), Asian Studies and History (3 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (1 paper) and Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (296 citations), Sociology and Political Science (329 citations), Anthropology (50 citations), Development (18 citations) and Public Administration (15 citations). John Girling has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Hewison, Charles F. Keyes, Craig J. Reynolds, Clark D. Neher, Hans‐Dieter Evers, Milton Osborne, Gareth Porter, Alfred W. McCoy, David A. Wilson and Karl D. Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, International Affairs, Australian Journal of Public Administration, Alternatives Global Local Political and The Pacific Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact