John G. Piper

743 citations
15 papers · 467 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases 2
    • Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment 2
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 2
    • Spinal Hematomas and Complications 2

John G. Piper

15 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

John G. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 64
  • Neurology 74
  • Surgery 189
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 72
  • Physiology 78
Replace Peter Zimmermann with:
Peter Zimmermann Germany
L. Halpern Israel
Hitoshi Fujioka Japan
B Gebhardt Germany
Costanza Rossi France
G. Salar Italy
Yoshihiro Hamaya Japan
Otakar R. Hubschmann United States
Toshiharu Kasaba Japan
Bruce Vrooman United States
John G. Piper relative to Peter Zimmermann Germany Peter Zimmermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Peter Zimmermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Piper. The network helps show where John G. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside John G. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John G. Piper Line = papers co-authored together John G. Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199595
2 199283
3 198649
4 199344
5 199543
6 199632
7 199532
8 199826
9 199417
10 199913
11 199711
12 201310
13 19959
14 19942
15 19951

About John G. Piper

John G. Piper is a scholar working on Neurology, Surgery, Epidemiology, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Spinal Hematomas and Complications (2 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (2 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (64 citations), Neurology (74 citations), Surgery (189 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (72 citations) and Physiology (78 citations). John G. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Arnold H. Menezes, Michael G. Muhonen, Kenneth A. Follett, Brian Charlesworth, Patrick W. Hitchon, John C. VanGilder, Gerald H. Clamon, Michael P. Jones, Viney Kumar and Steven A. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, Journal of neurosurgery, Pain, Brain Research and Journal of Trauma Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact