John E. Forestner

1.1k citations
29 papers · 873 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Forestner

27 papers receiving 798 citations

Peers

John E. Forestner
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Biochemistry 246
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 126
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 99
  • Developmental Neuroscience 36
  • Surgery 309
Replace B. Royston with:
B. Royston United Kingdom
P. Van der Linden Belgium
Mariam Noorani Tanzania
A. Rochette France
Steven R. Tosone United States
Mary P. Fillinger United States
Andrea Kelleher United Kingdom
K. Linko Finland
Per Lilleaasen Norway
E. Gilbart Belgium
John E. Forestner relative to B. Royston United Kingdom B. Royston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
B. Royston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Forestner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Forestner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Forestner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Forestner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Forestner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Forestner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Forestner. The network helps show where John E. Forestner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Forestner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Forestner Line = papers co-authored together John E. Forestner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003441
2 196869
3 197357
4 199155
5 200153
6 197427
7 197522
8 199022
9 200222
10 199021
11 198016
12 199911
13 19888
14 20008
15 19848
16 20007
17 20014
18 19884
19 19794
20 19793

About John E. Forestner

John E. Forestner is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (8 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Blood transfusion and management (3 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (3 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (246 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (126 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (99 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (36 citations) and Surgery (309 citations). John E. Forestner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Gary E. Hill, William H. Frawley, Joseph P. Minei, James E. Garvin, Joel B. Gunter, C. B. Taylor, Mehernoor F. Watcha, Paul F. White, Margarita Coloma and Jack L. Ratliff. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Anesthesiology, CHEST Journal, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica and Experimental Biology and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact