John Draper

43 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

John Draper
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Linguistics and Language 30
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 41
  • Plant Science 217
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 38
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 48
Replace Cherian George with:
Cherian George Hong Kong
Annika Olsson Sweden
Gilles Grenier Canada
Renee B. Kim South Korea
Mengxia Zhang China
Jesús Sebastián Spain
Xiangping Li Macao
Endang Purwaningsih Indonesia
Stephen M. Brown United States
John Draper relative to Cherian George Hong Kong Cherian George's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.5×
Cherian George · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Draper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Draper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Draper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Draper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Draper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Draper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Draper. The network helps show where John Draper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Draper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Draper Line = papers co-authored together John Draper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997178
2 202064
3 199061
4 199258
5 196621
6 201920
7 201919
8 201219
9 202019
10 199713
11 202012
12 202111
13 202011
14 202210
15 20149
16 20249
17 20139
18 20168
19 20197
20 20157

About John Draper

John Draper is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Linguistics and Language, Literature and Literary Theory and Strategy and Management, having authored 45 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (13 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (6 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (5 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (4 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), International Science and Diplomacy (3 papers), Cambodian History and Society (3 papers) and University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (30 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (41 citations), Plant Science (217 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (38 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (48 citations). John Draper has collaborated with scholars based in Thailand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elias G. Carayannis, M Roland, Peerasit Kamnuansilpa, Rod C. Scott, Joel Selway, Diane L. Hird, Dawn Worrall, Wyatt Paul, William R. McWhinnie and Luis A. J. Mur. Their work appears in journals such as Current Issues in Language Planning, Asian Ethnicity, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development and Nationalism and Ethnic Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact