John D. Oswald

1.0k citations
46 papers · 783 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John D. Oswald

45 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers

John D. Oswald
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 727
  • Insect Science 92
  • Genetics 177
  • Paleontology 49
  • Ecological Modeling 5
Replace Lionel Stange with:
Lionel Stange United States
Davide Badano Italy
Patrick Müller Germany
Fenglong Jia China
Jörg Wunderlich Germany
Yanli Che China
Dagmara Żyła Poland
Zongqing Wang China
Oliver Zompro Germany
Fangyuan Xia China
John D. Oswald relative to Lionel Stange United States Lionel Stange's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lionel Stange · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Oswald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Oswald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Oswald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Oswald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Oswald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Oswald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Oswald. The network helps show where John D. Oswald may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John D. Oswald, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John D. Oswald Line = papers co-authored together John D. Oswald links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Revision and cladistic analysis of the world genera of the family Hemerobiidae (Insecta: Neuroptera)
1993152
2 2017151
3 201872
4 199147
5 200443
6
A new genus of kalligrammatid lacewings from the Middle Jurassic of China (Neuroptera: Kalligrammatidae)
200226
7 200323
8 201921
9 199819
10 198818
11 199416
12 200114
13 199313
14 202013
15 199613
16 199013
17 201912
18 201010
19 20228
20 20238

About John D. Oswald

John D. Oswald is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Paleontology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 783 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fossil Insects in Amber (36 papers), Plant and animal studies (32 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (27 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (8 papers), Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (4 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (2 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (727 citations), Insect Science (92 citations), Genetics (177 citations), Paleontology (49 citations) and Ecological Modeling (5 citations). John D. Oswald has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Renato José Pires Machado, Norman D. Penny, Ivonne J. Garzón‐Orduña, Jéssica P. Gillung, Shaun L. Winterton, Emily Moriarty Lemmon, Alan R. Lemmon, Xingyue Liu, Laura C.V. Breitkreuz and Gary L. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Systematic Entomology, Insects, Annals of the Entomological Society of America and Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact