John Canfield
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Papers in
-
- Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing 4
-
- Calibration and Measurement Techniques 4
- Infrared Target Detection Methodologies 1
- Co-authors
- George Brims (5 shared papers)Ian S. McLean (4 shared papers)James Larkin (3 shared papers)Nick Magnone (2 shared papers)E. E. Becklin (2 shared papers)Donald F. Figer (2 shared papers)Harry I. Teplitz (2 shared papers)Woon K. Wong (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
John Canfield
8 papers receiving 796 citations
John Canfield's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Instrumentation 275
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 724
- Spectroscopy 94
- Atmospheric Science 69
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 46
Countries citing papers authored by John Canfield
This map shows the geographic impact of John Canfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Canfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Canfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Canfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Canfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Canfield. The network helps show where John Canfield may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Canfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Design and development of NIRSPEC: a near-infrared echelle spectrograph for the Keck II telescope Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 452 |
| 2 | 2012 | 183 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 87 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 7 |
About John Canfield
John Canfield is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Instrumentation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Calibration and Measurement Techniques (4 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (3 papers), Advanced optical system design (3 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (2 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (2 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (1 paper) and Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (275 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (724 citations), Spectroscopy (94 citations), Atmospheric Science (69 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (46 citations). John Canfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include George Brims, Ian S. McLean, James Larkin, Nick Magnone, E. E. Becklin, Donald F. Figer, Harry I. Teplitz, Woon K. Wong, James R. Graham and Samuel B. Larson. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.