John C. Moser

4.4k citations
141 papers · 3.7k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

John C. Moser

138 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

John C. Moser
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Insect Science 2.6k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.8k
  • Ecology 1.8k
  • Genetics 893
  • Parasitology 97
Replace Pierre Capy with:
Pierre Capy France
John W. H. Trueman Australia
Thomas Wilson Sappington United States
Louis van de Zande Netherlands
Hugh David Loxdale United Kingdom
Heike Hadrys Germany
Donald Gilbert United States
Patrick O’Grady United States
František Marec Czechia
Willem Scharloo Netherlands
John C. Moser relative to Pierre Capy France Pierre Capy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Pierre Capy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Moser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Moser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Moser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Moser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Moser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Moser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Moser. The network helps show where John C. Moser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C. Moser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Moser Line = papers co-authored together John C. Moser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 141 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1963188
2 2005159
3 1971125
4 1971113
5 200399
6 197491
7 196886
8 198580
9 198374
10 197266
11 200466
12 196764
13 200963
14 197463
15 200862
16 201361
17 196361
18 198957
19 200057
20 197553

About John C. Moser

John C. Moser is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 141 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (79 papers), Study of Mite Species (62 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (51 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (41 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (29 papers), Plant and animal studies (18 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (18 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (2.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.8k citations), Ecology (1.8k citations), Genetics (893 citations) and Parasitology (97 citations). John C. Moser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Murray S. Blum, Robert M. Silverstein, Richard William Hofstetter, Kier D. Klepzig, J. Robert Bridges, Matthew P. Ayres, Thelma J. Perry, Earle A. Cross, Robert G. Riley and Marı́a J. Lombardero. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Science, Environmental Entomology, Mycologia and Journal of Insect Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact