John C. Barnes

620 citations
8 papers · 353 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 6
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 2
    • Medieval Literature and History 1
    • Byzantine Studies and History 1

John C. Barnes

4 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

John C. Barnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Pharmacology 51
  • Biochemistry 35
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Food Science 94
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 37
Replace G. H. Mahran with:
G. H. Mahran Egypt
Mítzi Brandão Brazil
O. Hnatyszyn Argentina
Rosita Arvigo United States
N. Mascolo Italy
Muhammad Mukram Mohamed Mackeen Malaysia
Manfred Fiebig Germany
Jules Désiré Djoukeng Cameroon
S. V. Nwafor Nigeria
Eduardo Quisumbing United States
John C. Barnes relative to G. H. Mahran Egypt G. H. Mahran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
G. H. Mahran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Barnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Barnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Barnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Barnes. The network helps show where John C. Barnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside John C. Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Barnes Line = papers co-authored together John C. Barnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1999334
2 19966
3 19855
4 19783
5
Dante and the Middle Ages : literary and historical essays
19952
6 19731
7 19941
8 19791

About John C. Barnes

John C. Barnes is a scholar working on History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Complementary and alternative medicine and Physiology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (6 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (2 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (1 paper), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (51 citations), Biochemistry (35 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation), Food Science (94 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (37 citations). John C. Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Zygmunt G. Barański, Guido Bonsaver, Letizia Panizza, Brian Richardson, Mark Chu, Roberto Bruni, John A. Scott, Martin McLaughlin and Antonio Franceschetti. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Italian Studies, Quaderni d italianistica and Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact