John Brenkman

542 citations
27 papers · 275 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John Brenkman

17 papers receiving 116 citations

Peers

John Brenkman
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Literature and Literary Theory 73
  • Religious studies 25
  • Philosophy 44
  • Cultural Studies 25
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 14
Replace Alicia Ostriker with:
Alicia Ostriker United States
Frances B. Cogan United States
Charlotte Hogsett
Neil Larsen United States
Iris M. Zavala United States
Domna C. Stanton United States
Juliet Flower MacCannell United States
Marlon Β. Ross United States
Ellen Rooney United States
Kathleen Ashley United States
John Brenkman relative to Alicia Ostriker United States Alicia Ostriker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Alicia Ostriker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Brenkman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Brenkman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Brenkman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Brenkman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Brenkman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Brenkman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Brenkman. The network helps show where John Brenkman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside John Brenkman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Brenkman Line = papers co-authored together John Brenkman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198981
2 198354
3
Straight Male Modern: A Cultural Critique of Psychoanalysis
199328
4 197923
5 200715
6 200214
7 197711
8 199010
9 19997
10 19835
11 19955
12 19743
13 20023
14
Mood and Trope: The Rhetoric and Poetics of Affect
20203
15 19923
16 19943
17 20002
18 20192
19 20061
20 19791

About John Brenkman

John Brenkman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 27 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (4 papers), French Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), French Literature and Critical Theory (1 paper), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (1 paper), Digital Media and Philosophy (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (73 citations), Religious studies (25 citations), Philosophy (44 citations), Cultural Studies (25 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 citations). Frequent co-authors include Fredric Jameson and Michael Sprinker. Their work appears in journals such as Social Text, Narrative, Critical Inquiry, SubStance and NOVEL A Forum on Fiction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact