John Brenkman

541 citations
21 papers · 187 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
  • Philosophy top 10%
    • Rhetoric and Communication Studies

Papers in

John Brenkman

16 papers receiving 102 citations

Peers

John Brenkman
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Literature and Literary Theory 52
  • Philosophy 35
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
  • History 19
  • Cultural Studies 15
Replace Ernestine Schlant with:
Ernestine Schlant United States
Juliet Flower MacCannell United States
Charlotte Hogsett
Vincent P. Pecora United States
John Hellmann United States
Ellen E. Berry United States
Burton Pike United States
Marianna Torgovnick United States
Lindon Barrett United States
Alicia Ostriker United States
John Brenkman relative to Ernestine Schlant United States Ernestine Schlant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Ernestine Schlant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Brenkman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Brenkman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Brenkman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Brenkman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Brenkman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Brenkman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Brenkman. The network helps show where John Brenkman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside John Brenkman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Brenkman Line = papers co-authored together John Brenkman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198346
2 198931
3
Straight Male Modern: A Cultural Critique of Psychoanalysis
199323
4 197915
5 200214
6 200712
7 19907
8 19777
9 19955
10 19835
11 19995
12
Mood and Trope: The Rhetoric and Poetics of Affect
20203
13 19943
14 19923
15 20023
16 20192
17 19742
18 19891
19 20160
20 20150

About John Brenkman

John Brenkman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 21 papers that have together received 187 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), French Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (1 paper), Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies (1 paper), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (1 paper), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper) and Violence, Religion, and Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (52 citations), Philosophy (35 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations), History (19 citations) and Cultural Studies (15 citations). Frequent co-authors include Fredric Jameson and Michael Sprinker. Their work appears in journals such as Social Text, Narrative, Critical Inquiry, SubStance and New Literary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact