John Barrus

580 citations
9 papers · 405 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

John Barrus

8 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

John Barrus
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Human-Computer Interaction 92
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 41
  • Computer Networks and Communications 188
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 117
  • Control and Systems Engineering 64
Replace Paul T. Barham with:
Paul T. Barham United States
Henrik Tramberend Germany
Morihiko Tamai Japan
David J. Kasik United States
László Bokor Hungary
R. Cerqueira Brazil
P. Hartling United States
Ahsan Arefin United States
Allen Bierbaum United States
Jay Summet United States
John Barrus relative to Paul T. Barham United States Paul T. Barham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Paul T. Barham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Barrus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Barrus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Barrus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Barrus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Barrus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Barrus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Barrus. The network helps show where John Barrus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John Barrus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Barrus Line = papers co-authored together John Barrus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About John Barrus

John Barrus is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Control and Systems Engineering, Sociology and Political Science and Signal Processing, having authored 9 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (2 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (2 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (2 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (2 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (2 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (2 papers) and Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (92 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (41 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (188 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (117 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (64 citations). John Barrus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard C. Waters, David Anderson, Charles Rich, Chia Shen, Woodie C. Flowers, Eng Hock Tay, William Yerazunis, David C. Brogan, Michael A. Casey and Michael Gormish. Their work appears in journals such as PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE Multimedia, Research in Engineering Design and IEEE Spectrum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact