John Baldwin

56 papers receiving 901 citations

Peers

John Baldwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Earth-Surface Processes 206
  • Law 127
  • Ocean Engineering 159
  • Social Psychology 189
  • Clinical Psychology 138
Replace Alison Williams with:
Alison Williams United Kingdom
Luc Huyse United States
Robert Robert Indonesia
John Murphy United States
Kevin Kevin Indonesia
Adam Roberts United Kingdom
John E. Stewart United States
Andrea Schneider United States
Stuart James United Kingdom
A. T. Watson United States
John Baldwin relative to Alison Williams United Kingdom Alison Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21.2×
Alison Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Baldwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Baldwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Baldwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Baldwin. The network helps show where John Baldwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Baldwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Baldwin Line = papers co-authored together John Baldwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993179
2 1999110
3
The urban criminal: A study in Sheffield
197697
4 200078
5 198565
6 196742
7 200939
8 197438
9 198037
10
Confessions in Crown Court trials
198034
11 198232
12 197926
13
Wave Propagation Past a Pile-Restrained Floating Breakwater
199824
14 199122
15 197920
16 199719
17
Small Claims in the County Courts in England and Wales: The Bargain Basement of Civil Justice?
199819
18 198215
19 202013
20 197613

About John Baldwin

John Baldwin is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science, Earth-Surface Processes, Political Science and International Relations and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Evidence (9 papers), Legal principles and applications (7 papers), Coastal and Marine Dynamics (7 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers) and Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (206 citations), Law (127 citations), Ocean Engineering (159 citations), Social Psychology (189 citations) and Clinical Psychology (138 citations). John Baldwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Isaacson, Michael McConville, Stanley G. Hutton, Anthony Bottoms, MONICA A. WALKER, Gang Yang, David W. Kueker, A. J. Palubinskas, Kenneth R. McCormack and K. Ibel. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Criminology, Modern Law Review, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Applied Ocean Research and Law & Society Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact