John Bainbridge

23 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

John Bainbridge
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Virology 33
  • Pharmaceutical Science 36
  • Neurology 22
  • Oncology 67
  • Cancer Research 35
Replace Melinda Hajdu with:
Melinda Hajdu Hungary
Erxia Shen China
Nagy Adrienne Hungary
Claudia MacAuley United States
Vikram Arora United States
Ameer Abutaleb United States
Sherry A. Wuensch United States
Jonathan Cho United States
Zhi Zhang China
Gun Jönsson Sweden
John Bainbridge relative to Melinda Hajdu Hungary Melinda Hajdu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Melinda Hajdu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bainbridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bainbridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bainbridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bainbridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bainbridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bainbridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bainbridge. The network helps show where John Bainbridge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Bainbridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bainbridge Line = papers co-authored together John Bainbridge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201148
2 201144
3 200433
4 200731
5 200628
6 201423
7 200023
8 201719
9 199819
10 201415
11 201014
12 201714
13 200813
14 201713
15 200312
16 200412
17 201410
18 20136
19 19655
20 20204

About John Bainbridge

John Bainbridge is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Virology and Oncology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (3 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (3 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (2 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper) and Microbial infections and disease research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (33 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (36 citations), Neurology (22 citations), Oncology (67 citations) and Cancer Research (35 citations). John Bainbridge has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth B. Walker, Paul A. Godley, William R. Carpenter, Ewa Paleolog, Katherine E. Reeder‐Hayes, Bryan J. Weiner, Keith D. Amos, Barry Walker, Jonathan M. Percy and Branavan Sivakumar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Immunological Methods, Clinical & Experimental Immunology, Journal of Virology, British Journal of Haematology and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact