John B. Bowles

43 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

John B. Bowles
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 444
  • Software 194
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 377
  • Management Science and Operations Research 426
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 40
Replace Genbao Zhang with:
Genbao Zhang China
V. Ebrahimipour Iran
Hiromitsu Kumamoto Japan
Yan Ran China
Qinglian Lin China
Jinhua Mi China
Arnljot Høyland United States
William E. Vesely United States
Charles E. Ebeling United States
C.H. Lie South Korea
John B. Bowles relative to Genbao Zhang China Genbao Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.4×
Genbao Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John B. Bowles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John B. Bowles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John B. Bowles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John B. Bowles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John B. Bowles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John B. Bowles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John B. Bowles. The network helps show where John B. Bowles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside John B. Bowles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John B. Bowles Line = papers co-authored together John B. Bowles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995562
2 1995124
3 199280
4 200278
5 200372
6 199867
7 200233
8 200231
9 200626
10 200225
11 200225
12 200224
13 199420
14 200414
15 200613
16 200611
17 200311
18 19949
19 20028
20 19908

About John B. Bowles

John B. Bowles is a scholar working on Software, Information Systems, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Reliability and Analysis Research (13 papers), Software Engineering Research (10 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (5 papers), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (5 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (5 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (4 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (3 papers) and Information and Cyber Security (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (444 citations), Software (194 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (377 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (426 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (40 citations). John B. Bowles has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Enrique Peláez, David J. Russomanno, Chengcheng Wan, Caroline M. Eastman, Swaminathan Venkatraman, Javier Pereira, Michael N. Huhns, Marco Valtorta, Robert Vichnevetsky and Michael S. Leonard. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Mathematics of Computation, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Quality and Reliability Engineering International and Proceedings of the IEEE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact