John A. Gentry

448 citations
44 papers · 233 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John A. Gentry

37 papers receiving 172 citations

Peers

John A. Gentry
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Political Science and International Relations 158
  • Sociology and Political Science 74
  • Strategy and Management 24
  • Anthropology 9
  • Management Information Systems 8
Replace Andrew Mathers with:
Andrew Mathers United Kingdom
Russell W. Glenn United States
William S. Lind
David Betz United Kingdom
A. Walter Dorn Canada
Antulio J. Echevarria United States
Mauro Gilli United States
Austin Horng‐En Wang United States
MacGregor Knox United Kingdom
Roberta Wohlstetter
John A. Gentry relative to Andrew Mathers United Kingdom Andrew Mathers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Andrew Mathers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Gentry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Gentry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Gentry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Gentry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Gentry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Gentry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Gentry. The network helps show where John A. Gentry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside John A. Gentry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Gentry Line = papers co-authored together John A. Gentry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200823
2 201522
3 201021
4 201518
5 200216
6 201914
7 201612
8 20148
9 20167
10 19957
11 20066
12 20106
13 19986
14 20185
15 20175
16 19994
17 20194
18 20144
19 20194
20 20104

About John A. Gentry

John A. Gentry is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Control and Systems Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 44 papers that have together received 233 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (27 papers), Military History and Strategy (9 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), Military and Defense Studies (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (3 papers), Military Defense Systems Analysis (2 papers), Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (2 papers) and European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (158 citations), Sociology and Political Science (74 citations), Strategy and Management (24 citations), Anthropology (9 citations) and Management Information Systems (8 citations). John A. Gentry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Greece. Frequent co-authors include David E. Spencer, Robert Malcolm, Caroline S. Hill, Minhua Wang, Xulei Lu, Paromita Roy, Lei Zhang, Margaret Brandwein‐Weber, Scott Doyle and Brendan Conn. Their work appears in journals such as Intelligence & National Security, The Washington Quarterly, Political Science Quarterly, International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence and Security Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact