John A. Dean

2.3k citations
74 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

John A. Dean

72 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

John A. Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Analytical Chemistry 431
  • Electrochemistry 236
  • Bioengineering 162
  • Filtration and Separation 53
  • Spectroscopy 278
Replace Robert A. Chalmers with:
Robert A. Chalmers United Kingdom
J. Inczédy Hungary
Donald F. Othmer United States
Peter F. Lott United States
Gilbert Gordon United States
Al Steyermark United States
Lauri H. J. Lajunen Finland
F. Helfferich United States
Walter Lund Norway
J. Starý Czechia
John A. Dean relative to Robert A. Chalmers United Kingdom Robert A. Chalmers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Robert A. Chalmers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Dean. The network helps show where John A. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside John A. Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Dean Line = papers co-authored together John A. Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Analytical Chemistry Handbook
1995388
2
Flame Emission and Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.
1969172
3 2000170
4 196270
5 196847
6 196045
7
Chemical Separation Methods
196937
8 196236
9 197529
10 195828
11 196327
12 195527
13 195723
14 200823
15 195522
16 197121
17 196321
18 195119
19 195919
20 197218

About John A. Dean

John A. Dean is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Electrochemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical chemistry methods development (27 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (15 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (12 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (9 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (8 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (7 papers), Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (6 papers) and Extraction and Separation Processes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (431 citations), Electrochemistry (236 citations), Bioengineering (162 citations), Filtration and Separation (53 citations) and Spectroscopy (278 citations). John A. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include T. C. Rains, Dayakar Penumadu, T. H. Handley, W. D. Shults, Gérald Goldstein, Oscar Menis, M. T. Kelley, M. Mofazzal Hossain, Yoshio Tomimatsu and M.R. Guerin. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Analytical Letters, Analytica Chimica Acta, The Analyst and Talanta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact