John A. Booth

120 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

John A. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Instrumentation 344
  • Political Science and International Relations 891
  • Communication 209
  • Development 93
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 389
Replace D. Downes with:
D. Downes France
Piers Robinson United Kingdom
Matt Hilton United Kingdom
Joan Font Spain
José Luís Spain
T. Blöcker Germany
Roger Griffin United Kingdom
Michael A. Weinstein United States
Barbara Jones United States
Andrew D. Martin United States
John A. Booth relative to D. Downes France D. Downes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
D. Downes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Booth. The network helps show where John A. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John A. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Booth Line = papers co-authored together John A. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 132 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009238
2 2009177
3 1998155
4 1998144
5 1993101
6 200989
7
Costa Rica: Quest For Democracy
199871
8 198962
9 199856
10 200756
11 199356
12 199049
13
Political participation in Latin America
197843
14 199142
15 200542
16 201140
17 198438
18 200432
19 199629
20 201029

About John A. Booth

John A. Booth is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 132 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (35 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (31 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (23 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (19 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (11 papers), Social Media and Politics (11 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (10 papers) and Social Capital and Networks (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (344 citations), Political Science and International Relations (891 citations), Communication (209 citations), Development (93 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (389 citations). John A. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Mitchell A. Seligson, Patricia Bayer Richard, James K. McCarthy, David Boyd, Gary J. Hill, Abraham F. Lowenthal, John M. Good, Phillip J. MacQueen, C. Anthony Hart and James R. Fowler. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, Latin American Research Review, Latin American Politics and Society, Opinião Pública and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact