Johan Linåker

600 citations
31 papers · 427 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Johan Linåker

28 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Johan Linåker
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Computer Science Applications 180
  • Information Systems 236
  • Communication 68
  • Software 37
  • Management Information Systems 67
Replace Carlos Denner dos Santos with:
Carlos Denner dos Santos Brazil
Stefan Seedorf Germany
Terhi Kilamo Finland
Kris Ven Belgium
Eugenio Capra Italy
Øyvind Hauge Norway
Pentti Marttiin Finland
Jacob Nørbjerg Denmark
Jakob Holden Iversen United States
Phillip Glen Armour United States
Johan Linåker relative to Carlos Denner dos Santos Brazil Carlos Denner dos Santos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Carlos Denner dos Santos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Linåker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Linåker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Linåker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Linåker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Linåker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Linåker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Linåker. The network helps show where Johan Linåker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Johan Linåker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Linåker Line = papers co-authored together Johan Linåker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Guidelines for Conducting Surveys in Software Engineering
2015112
2 201741
3 201733
4 201925
5 202223
6 201623
7 202215
8 202114
9 201613
10 201412
11 202012
12 201512
13 201712
14 201812
15 201511
16 201910
17 202210
18 20207
19 20217
20 20207

About Johan Linåker

Johan Linåker is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Communication, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management, having authored 31 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Open Source Software Innovations (24 papers), Software Engineering Research (15 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (10 papers), E-Government and Public Services (6 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers), FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (3 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (3 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (180 citations), Information Systems (236 citations), Communication (68 citations), Software (37 citations) and Management Information Systems (67 citations). Johan Linåker has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Björn Regnell, Martin Höst, Per Runeson, Rafael de Mello, Krzysztof Wnuk, Hussan Munir, Daniela Damian, Daniela Damian, Patrick Mäder and Iryna Susha. Their work appears in journals such as Empirical Software Engineering, IEEE Software, Journal of Systems and Software, Government Information Quarterly and Information and Software Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact