Joe MacMahon

552 citations
17 papers · 435 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Joe MacMahon

16 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Joe MacMahon
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 262
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
  • Physiology 73
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 61
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 22
Replace Jo Congleton with:
Jo Congleton United Kingdom
Ivar Ellingsen Norway
Prue E. Munro Australia
Patrick Marcel Muggensturm Switzerland
Chris M. Garvey United States
Norbert Metzdorf Germany
Mahmud Saedon United Kingdom
Fred P. Mollenkopf United States
Laura Kay Shoemaker United States
Roberto Walter Dal Negro Italy
Joe MacMahon relative to Jo Congleton United Kingdom Jo Congleton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Jo Congleton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joe MacMahon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joe MacMahon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joe MacMahon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joe MacMahon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joe MacMahon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joe MacMahon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joe MacMahon. The network helps show where Joe MacMahon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joe MacMahon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joe MacMahon Line = papers co-authored together Joe MacMahon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
Guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery
2005120
2 200776
3 200552
4 199837
5 199632
6 199327
7 199419
8 199916
9 200815
10 200512
11 195510
12 19959
13 20065
14 20063
15
Knowledge and self-efficacy questionnaires in COPD: a review
20101
16
Lung cancer survival in Northern Ireland.
20031
17 20210

About Joe MacMahon

Joe MacMahon is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Surgery and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (1 paper), Respiratory viral infections research (1 paper) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (262 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations), Physiology (73 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (61 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (22 citations). Joe MacMahon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include J. Stuart Elborn, Judy Martina Bradley, Brenda M O'Neill, Liam Gabriel Heaney, Toby J Lasserson, Paul K. Plant, Daniel Francis McAuley, M F Muers, R.M. Rudd and Maxwell Roland. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical Practice, Thorax, QJM, CHEST Journal and Chronic Respiratory Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact