Jodie Smith

806 citations
31 papers · 498 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Jodie Smith

28 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers

Jodie Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 267
  • Ceramics and Composites 48
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 94
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 322
  • Computational Mechanics 79
Replace Johannes Wolf with:
Johannes Wolf Germany
S. Matsuo Japan
You-Nian Wang China
Quan Dong China
A. Nehari France
P. Thompson United Kingdom
J. W. Glesener United States
Martin Smrž Czechia
Amy L. Rigatti United States
A.P. Kobzev Russia
Jodie Smith relative to Johannes Wolf Germany Johannes Wolf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Johannes Wolf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jodie Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jodie Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jodie Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jodie Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jodie Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jodie Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jodie Smith. The network helps show where Jodie Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jodie Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jodie Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jodie Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017124
2 201662
3 201552
4 201240
5 201329
6 201826
7 201625
8 201518
9 202016
10 202115
11 201713
12 202012
13 202112
14 20178
15 20197
16 20247
17 20187
18 20146
19 20153
20 20153

About Jodie Smith

Jodie Smith is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computational Mechanics and Radiation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solid State Laser Technologies (22 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (15 papers), Laser Design and Applications (14 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (8 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (5 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (5 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (4 papers) and Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (267 citations), Ceramics and Composites (48 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (94 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (322 citations) and Computational Mechanics (79 citations). Jodie Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Butcher, Paul Mason, Saumyabrata Banerjee, Klaus Ertel, Cristina Hernandez–Gomez, John Collier, Jonathan Phillips, Chris Edwards, Martin Divoký and Jan Pilař. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Optical Materials Express, Optics Letters, High Power Laser Science and Engineering and Journal of Materials Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact