Jochen Kleinschmit

400 citations
4 papers · 297 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Jochen Kleinschmit

4 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Jochen Kleinschmit
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 92
  • Genetics 128
  • Plant Science 125
  • Ecological Modeling 13
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 58
Replace Santiago Espinel with:
Santiago Espinel Spain
Hassan Sbay United States
T. M. Hardig United States
Satoshi Kikuchi Japan
Ditte C. Olrik Denmark
Marina de Miguel France
Claudia Segovia Salcedo Ecuador
Valérie Léger France
Keiya Isoda Japan
Pekka Vakkari Finland
Jochen Kleinschmit relative to Santiago Espinel Spain Santiago Espinel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Santiago Espinel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jochen Kleinschmit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Kleinschmit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Kleinschmit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Kleinschmit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jochen Kleinschmit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Kleinschmit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Kleinschmit. The network helps show where Jochen Kleinschmit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Jochen Kleinschmit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jochen Kleinschmit Line = papers co-authored together Jochen Kleinschmit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1 2002169
2 2002106
3 201020
4
Konzept zur Erhaltung forstlicher Genressourcen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
19892

About Jochen Kleinschmit

Jochen Kleinschmit is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Cell Biology, having authored 4 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1 paper), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (1 paper), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper), Ecology and Conservation Studies (1 paper), Linguistic research and analysis (1 paper), Narrative Theory and Analysis (1 paper) and Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (92 citations), Genetics (128 citations), Plant Science (125 citations), Ecological Modeling (13 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (58 citations). Jochen Kleinschmit has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Antoine Kremer, R.C. Munro, Andrew J. Lowe, Joan Cottrell, Alexis Ducousso, Rémy J. Petit, Armin O. König, Jan H. Jensen, Ian Forrest and Alexis A. Ducousso. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Science, Annals of Forest Science and OpenAgrar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact