Joachim Offenberg

2.0k citations
67 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Joachim Offenberg

66 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Joachim Offenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Insect Science 743
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 731
  • Genetics 821
  • Ecology 447
  • Oceanography 109
Replace Cyril Piou with:
Cyril Piou France
Mogens Gissel Nielsen Denmark
Gavin R. Broad United Kingdom
Mark Deyrup United States
Alan Tye Ecuador
Amy E. Arnett United States
Úna Fitzpatrick Ireland
Arthur Y. C. Chung Malaysia
Robert A. Laird Canada
Rudi Verovnik Slovenia
Joachim Offenberg relative to Cyril Piou France Cyril Piou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Cyril Piou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Offenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Offenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Offenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Offenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Offenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Offenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Offenberg. The network helps show where Joachim Offenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joachim Offenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joachim Offenberg Line = papers co-authored together Joachim Offenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008371
2 2001157
3 2015114
4 200464
5 201046
6 200841
7 201337
8 200436
9 201034
10 201930
11 200427
12 200726
13 201823
14 200023
15 201519
16 201718
17 200518
18 201718
19 202117
20 201917

About Joachim Offenberg

Joachim Offenberg is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (60 papers), Plant and animal studies (48 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (35 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (743 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (731 citations), Genetics (821 citations), Ecology (447 citations) and Oceanography (109 citations). Joachim Offenberg has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Tanzania and France. Frequent co-authors include Stefano Cannicci, Damien Burrows, Sara Fratini, Farid Dahdouh‐Guebas, Thomas J. Smith, Mogens Gissel Nielsen, Decha Wiwatwitaya, Donald Macintosh, Christian Damgaard and Sanit Aksornkoae. Their work appears in journals such as Insectes Sociaux, Biotropica, Journal of Applied Entomology, Oikos and Journal of Insects as Food and Feed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact