Jo Phoenix

772 citations
51 papers · 492 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jo Phoenix

44 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Jo Phoenix
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Gender Studies 149
  • Clinical Psychology 215
  • Sociology and Political Science 437
  • Public Administration 22
  • General Health Professions 107
Replace Maddy Coy with:
Maddy Coy United Kingdom
May‐Len Skilbrei Norway
Andrea J. Nichols United States
Stacey Hannem Canada
Jennifer Musto United States
Laurie Schaffner United States
D. Kelly Weisberg United States
Alison Gerard Australia
Morris Jenkins United States
Mindy S. Bradley United States
Jo Phoenix relative to Maddy Coy United Kingdom Maddy Coy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Maddy Coy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Phoenix

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Phoenix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Phoenix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Phoenix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Phoenix

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Phoenix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Phoenix. The network helps show where Jo Phoenix may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jo Phoenix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Phoenix Line = papers co-authored together Jo Phoenix links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201371
2 199971
3 200143
4 200241
5 200039
6
Illicit and illegal : sex, regulation and social control.
200527
7 201524
8
Beyond risk assessment : the return of repressive welfarism.
200920
9 200713
10 202013
11 200911
12 201010
13 200710
14 20098
15
Youth prostitution policy reform : new discourses, same old story.
20027
16 20166
17
A Child-Friendly Youth Justice?
20186
18 20156
19 20086
20 20035

About Jo Phoenix

Jo Phoenix is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Epidemiology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (29 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (12 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (6 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (5 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (3 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (149 citations), Clinical Psychology (215 citations), Sociology and Political Science (437 citations), Public Administration (22 citations) and General Health Professions (107 citations). Jo Phoenix has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Laura Kelly, Rosemary Ricciardelli, James Gacek, Robert MacDonald, K. Schiffer, Sylvia Walby, Pat Carlen, Emma C. Murphy, Amy Elliott and Kelly Hannah‐Moffat. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Criminology, Punishment & Society, Sexualities, Critical Social Policy and The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact