J.M.C. Jonathan

837 citations
44 papers · 631 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

J.M.C. Jonathan

41 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers

J.M.C. Jonathan
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 545
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 453
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 79
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 28
  • Media Technology 31
Replace R. S. Cudney with:
R. S. Cudney Mexico
А. Л. Толстик Belarus
Afshin Partovi United States
Sadahiko Yamamoto Japan
G. Carey United States
D. H. Close United States
Gregory D. Miller United States
S. Gottardo Italy
Xuanyi Yu China
Karl M. Kissa United States
J.M.C. Jonathan relative to R. S. Cudney Mexico R. S. Cudney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
R. S. Cudney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.M.C. Jonathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.M.C. Jonathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M.C. Jonathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M.C. Jonathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.M.C. Jonathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M.C. Jonathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M.C. Jonathan. The network helps show where J.M.C. Jonathan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.M.C. Jonathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.M.C. Jonathan Line = papers co-authored together J.M.C. Jonathan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986191
2 198642
3 199031
4 198831
5 198822
6 197921
7 198320
8 199117
9 199717
10 198917
11 197917
12 200016
13 199715
14 199914
15 199913
16 199712
17 198811
18 198011
19 197911
20 199210

About J.M.C. Jonathan

J.M.C. Jonathan is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 44 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (27 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (24 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (15 papers), Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry (8 papers), Optical Coatings and Gratings (5 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (4 papers), Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (3 papers) and Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (545 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (453 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (79 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (28 citations) and Media Technology (31 citations). J.M.C. Jonathan has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R. W. Hellwarth, F. P. Strohkendl, G. Roosen, M. May, N. Huot, Gilles Pauliat, Daniel Rytz, André Villing, Jouni Partanen and P. Nouchi. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Communications, Optics Letters, Applied Physics B, Journal of the Optical Society of America B and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact