Jinglu Li

478 citations
38 papers · 320 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jinglu Li

32 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Jinglu Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 157
  • Artificial Intelligence 146
  • Management Science and Operations Research 47
  • Marketing 32
  • Ocean Engineering 40
Replace Jörg Stork with:
Jörg Stork Germany
Ken Yeh Taiwan
Yahachiro TSUKAMOTO Japan
Jin Yan China
Evren Gul United States
Clodomir Santana Brazil
Kaiwen Chen United Kingdom
Hanqing Hu China
Jinglu Li relative to Jörg Stork Germany Jörg Stork's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Jörg Stork · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jinglu Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jinglu Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jinglu Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jinglu Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jinglu Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jinglu Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jinglu Li. The network helps show where Jinglu Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jinglu Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jinglu Li Line = papers co-authored together Jinglu Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202344
2 202238
3 202233
4 202124
5 202220
6 201919
7 202318
8 202218
9 202215
10 202311
11 202210
12 202110
13 20069
14 20238
15 20227
16 20246
17 20253
18 20233
19 20203
20 20203

About Jinglu Li

Jinglu Li is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Ocean Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 38 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (11 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (11 papers), Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems (7 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (6 papers), Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems (4 papers), Power Systems and Technologies (3 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (3 papers) and Smart Grid and Power Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (157 citations), Artificial Intelligence (146 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (47 citations), Marketing (32 citations) and Ocean Engineering (40 citations). Jinglu Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Malaysia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Huachao Dong, Peng Wang, Jiangtao Shen, Caihua Chen, Jun Xiao, Peng Wang, Baowei Song, Wenxin Wang, Chen Xu and Xinjing Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Ships and Offshore Structures, Applied Soft Computing, Knowledge-Based Systems and Ocean Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact