Jim Smith

5.2k citations
178 papers · 4.0k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

Jim Smith

168 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Jim Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 188
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.6k
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 498
  • Strategy and Management 1.4k
  • Building and Construction 1.1k
  • Management Information Systems 341
Replace Paul Olomolaiye with:
Paul Olomolaiye United Kingdom
Bo Xia Australia
Charles Egbu United Kingdom
Kumar Neeraj Jha India
Igor Martek Australia
Cynthia Wang Australia
Yujie Lu China
Hamzah Abdul‐Rahman Malaysia
David Proverbs United Kingdom
Joseph H.K. Lai Hong Kong
Jim Smith relative to Paul Olomolaiye United Kingdom Paul Olomolaiye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paul Olomolaiye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Smith. The network helps show where Jim Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jim Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jim Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jim Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 178 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003235
2 2004199
3 2012167
4 2014163
5 2014131
6 2015114
7 201297
8 200394
9 201493
10 200090
11 201480
12 201080
13 201178
14 201671
15 199970
16 200969
17 201368
18 201667
19 201964
20 200262

About Jim Smith

Jim Smith is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Building and Construction, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Social Psychology, having authored 178 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Construction Project Management and Performance (54 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (28 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (26 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (19 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (18 papers), Facilities and Workplace Management (17 papers), Value Engineering and Management (10 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (1.6k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (498 citations), Strategy and Management (1.4k citations), Building and Construction (1.1k citations) and Management Information Systems (341 citations). Jim Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter E.D. Love, Michael Regan, Junxiao Liu, Craig Langston, Gillian Cavell, Sheila Conejos, David J. Edwards, Peter Davis, Zahir Irani and Elie Bou‐Zeid. Their work appears in journals such as Facilities, Production Planning & Control, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Journal of Infrastructure Systems and Journal of Management in Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact