Jim Smith

5.2k citations
183 papers · 4.1k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

Jim Smith

172 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Jim Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 189
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.7k
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 502
  • Strategy and Management 1.4k
  • Building and Construction 1.1k
  • Management Information Systems 351
Replace Kumar Neeraj Jha with:
Kumar Neeraj Jha India
Paul Olomolaiye United Kingdom
Bo Xia Australia
Charles Egbu United Kingdom
Igor Martek Australia
Cynthia Wang Australia
Dilanthi Amaratunga United Kingdom
Yujie Lu China
Xianbo Zhao Australia
Heap‐Yih Chong Australia
Jim Smith relative to Kumar Neeraj Jha India Kumar Neeraj Jha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kumar Neeraj Jha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Smith. The network helps show where Jim Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jim Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jim Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jim Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 183 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003248
2 2004208
3 2012168
4 2014168
5 2014133
6 2015117
7 2012105
8 200395
9 201493
10 200092
11 201482
12 201082
13 201181
14 200273
15 201672
16 200971
17 199970
18 201369
19 201668
20 201967

About Jim Smith

Jim Smith is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Building and Construction, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Social Psychology, having authored 183 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Construction Project Management and Performance (54 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (29 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (26 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (19 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (18 papers), Facilities and Workplace Management (17 papers), Value Engineering and Management (10 papers) and Quality and Supply Management (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (1.7k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (502 citations), Strategy and Management (1.4k citations), Building and Construction (1.1k citations) and Management Information Systems (351 citations). Jim Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter E.D. Love, Michael Regan, Junxiao Liu, Craig Langston, Gillian Cavell, Sheila Conejos, David J. Edwards, Peter Davis, Zahir Irani and Fran Ackermann. Their work appears in journals such as Facilities, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Production Planning & Control, Journal of Infrastructure Systems and Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact