Jim Carter

462 citations
27 papers · 322 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Jim Carter

25 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Jim Carter
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Human-Computer Interaction 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 53
  • Nephrology 17
  • Information Systems and Management 19
  • Information Systems 51
Replace David A. McMeekin with:
David A. McMeekin Australia
Mehmet Göktürk Türkiye
Oli Mival United Kingdom
Izdihar Jamil India
Dimitris Charitos Greece
Mirjam Augstein Austria
Stephen Forshaw United Kingdom
Debbie Stone United Kingdom
Nazean Jomhari Malaysia
Bruce Tognazzini United States
Jim Carter relative to David A. McMeekin Australia David A. McMeekin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
David A. McMeekin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Carter. The network helps show where Jim Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jim Carter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jim Carter Line = papers co-authored together Jim Carter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016149
2 201040
3 200426
4 200219
5 199417
6 200216
7 20187
8 20045
9 20045
10 19735
11 20195
12 20064
13 20124
14 20204
15 20212
16 20062
17 20102
18 20062
19 20172
20
Putting Usability First in the Design of Web Sites.
19971

About Jim Carter

Jim Carter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction and Surgery, having authored 27 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (5 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (3 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (2 papers), solar cell performance optimization (2 papers) and Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (81 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (53 citations), Nephrology (17 citations), Information Systems and Management (19 citations) and Information Systems (51 citations). Jim Carter has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Susan Harker, Jonathan Earthy, Nigel Bevan, Gerhard Weber, Jan B. F. van Erp, Ki‐Uk Kyung, Stephen Brewster, Carl Muthu, Richard Flint and Norman T. Sheehan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Italian Cinema and Media Studies, ANZ Journal of Surgery, Italian Culture, Journal of Modern Italian Studies and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact