Jérôme Malick

48 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jérôme Malick
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Numerical Analysis 505
  • Computational Mathematics 39
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 543
  • Computational Mechanics 413
  • Mathematical Physics 71
Replace Houduo Qi with:
Houduo Qi United Kingdom
François Glineur Belgium
Ting Kei Pong Hong Kong
Shaohua Pan China
Rekha R. Thomas United States
Aris Daniilidis France
Etienne de Klerk Netherlands
Sandra A. Santos Brazil
Bing Zheng China
Zhi-Quan Luo United States
Jérôme Malick relative to Houduo Qi United Kingdom Houduo Qi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Houduo Qi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jérôme Malick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jérôme Malick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jérôme Malick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jérôme Malick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jérôme Malick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jérôme Malick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jérôme Malick. The network helps show where Jérôme Malick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jérôme Malick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jérôme Malick Line = papers co-authored together Jérôme Malick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012180
2 2008135
3 2008127
4 200495
5 200994
6 201040
7 201233
8 200530
9 201730
10 201130
11 201227
12 201426
13 200626
14 201525
15 201823
16 200921
17 201218
18 201518
19 201816
20 200615

About Jérôme Malick

Jérôme Malick is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computational Mechanics, Artificial Intelligence and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (29 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (15 papers), Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (12 papers), Risk and Portfolio Optimization (10 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (7 papers), Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques (6 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (5 papers) and Blind Source Separation Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (505 citations), Computational Mathematics (39 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (543 citations), Computational Mechanics (413 citations) and Mathematical Physics (71 citations). Jérôme Malick has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Adrian S. Lewis, P.-A. Absil, Frédéric Roupin, D. Lüke, Wim van Ackooij, Nathan Krislock, Didier Henrion, Janez Povh, Franz Rendl and Angelika Wiegele. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematical Programming, SIAM Journal on Optimization, Set-Valued and Variational Analysis, Mathematics of Operations Research and Computational Optimization and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact