Jens Teiser

1.5k citations
76 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jens Teiser

71 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Jens Teiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 898
  • Earth-Surface Processes 155
  • Physiology 37
  • Ocean Engineering 110
  • Spectroscopy 109
Replace C. Güttler with:
C. Güttler Germany
Toru Suyama Japan
T. Poppe Germany
A. D. McEwan Australia
А. А. Левченко Russia
A. G. G. M. Tielens Netherlands
Rainer Schräpler Germany
Taku Takeuchi Japan
Vincenzo Della Corte Italy
Minoru Sekiya Japan
Jens Teiser relative to C. Güttler Germany C. Güttler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
C. Güttler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Teiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Teiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Teiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Teiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Teiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Teiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Teiser. The network helps show where Jens Teiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jens Teiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jens Teiser Line = papers co-authored together Jens Teiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200976
2 201973
3 201663
4 201656
5 200852
6 201346
7 201238
8 202138
9 201834
10 200830
11 201030
12 201829
13 201329
14 201227
15 202025
16 201724
17 201922
18 201721
19 202120
20 201920

About Jens Teiser

Jens Teiser is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Earth-Surface Processes, Ocean Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Atmospheric Science, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (46 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (35 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (34 papers), Aeolian processes and effects (15 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (10 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (9 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (6 papers) and Granular flow and fluidized beds (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (898 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (155 citations), Physiology (37 citations), Ocean Engineering (110 citations) and Spectroscopy (109 citations). Jens Teiser has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Wurm, Grzegorz Musiolik, T. Kelling, Jürgen Blum, D. Reiss, Dietrich E. Wolf, Troy Shinbrot, Lothar Brendel, H. Haack and A. Bischoff. Their work appears in journals such as Icarus, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Planetary Science Journal, The Astrophysical Journal and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact