Jens Hämling
Impact in
- Genetics top 10%
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease
-
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Papers in
-
- Blood properties and coagulation 2
-
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology 2
- Co-authors
- Stefan Schreiber (4 shared papers)Andreas Raedler (3 shared papers)Jochen Hampe (1 shared paper)Irmtraut Koop (1 shared paper)Susanna Nikolaus (1 shared paper)R A Jackson (4 shared papers)P.M. Blix (4 shared papers)J. D. N. Nabarro (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Metabolism (2 papers)The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (2 papers)Gastroenterology (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)Digestion (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jens Hämling
9 papers receiving 413 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Genetics 199
- Complementary and alternative medicine 27
- Physiology 68
- Cell Biology 43
- Immunology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Jens Hämling
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Hämling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Hämling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Hämling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Hämling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Hämling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Hämling. The network helps show where Jens Hämling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jens Hämling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 216 | |
| 2 | 1997 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 31 | |
| 5 | Lack of clinical efficacy of additional factor XIII treatment in patients with steroid refractory colitis. The Factor XIII Study Group. | 1999 | 20 |
| 6 | 1984 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 6 |
About Jens Hämling
Jens Hämling is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (2 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper) and Nephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (199 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (27 citations), Physiology (68 citations), Cell Biology (43 citations) and Immunology (49 citations). Jens Hämling has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Schreiber, Andreas Raedler, Jochen Hampe, Irmtraut Koop, Susanna Nikolaus, R A Jackson, P.M. Blix, J. D. N. Nabarro, Mohammed I. Hawa and Wolfgang Kruis. Their work appears in journals such as Metabolism, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Gastroenterology, The Lancet and Digestion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.