Jenna Scott
Impact in
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
-
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Papers in
- Genetics 6
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 6
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 1
- Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease 1
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 1
- Co-authors
- Kelly A. Metcalfe (2 shared papers)C. Blake Gilks (1 shared paper)Karen H. Lu (1 shared paper)Charmaine Kim‐Sing (2 shared papers)Charlotte C. Sun (1 shared paper)Molly S. Daniels (1 shared paper)Steven Alexander Narod (2 shared papers)Janice S. Kwon (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psycho-Oncology (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)BMC Cancer (1 paper)British Journal of Cancer (1 paper)Journal of Genetic Counseling (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jenna Scott
9 papers receiving 301 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 96
- Genetics 155
- Reproductive Medicine 34
- Cancer Research 52
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Jenna Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Jenna Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenna Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenna Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jenna Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenna Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenna Scott. The network helps show where Jenna Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jenna Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 89 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 9 | Identifying and dealing with cryptocurrency assets in corporate insolvency | 2018 | 1 |
About Jenna Scott
Jenna Scott is a scholar working on Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology, Accounting and Cancer Research, having authored 9 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (1 paper), Corporate Insolvency and Governance (1 paper), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (96 citations), Genetics (155 citations), Reproductive Medicine (34 citations), Cancer Research (52 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (19 citations). Jenna Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kelly A. Metcalfe, C. Blake Gilks, Karen H. Lu, Charmaine Kim‐Sing, Charlotte C. Sun, Molly S. Daniels, Steven Alexander Narod, Janice S. Kwon, Amy Finch and Peng Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, BMC Cancer, British Journal of Cancer and Journal of Genetic Counseling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.