J.E.L. Bishop

82 papers receiving 887 citations

Peers

J.E.L. Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 774
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 623
  • Condensed Matter Physics 151
  • Mechanical Engineering 423
  • Structural Biology 5
Replace M. Labrune with:
M. Labrune France
P. Ciureanu Canada
V. S. Gornakov Russia
Y. Mimura Japan
M. Tejedor Spain
C. H. Wilts United States
Y. Hosoe Japan
James Rantschler United States
S. S. Malhotra United States
Gabriel Bochi United States
J.E.L. Bishop relative to M. Labrune France M. Labrune's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
M. Labrune · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.E.L. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.E.L. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.E.L. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.E.L. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.E.L. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.E.L. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.E.L. Bishop. The network helps show where J.E.L. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.E.L. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.E.L. Bishop Line = papers co-authored together J.E.L. Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199846
2 196645
3 197340
4 199836
5 197136
6 196633
7 200231
8 199831
9 200129
10 198828
11 197623
12 197622
13 196321
14 198021
15 199620
16 198820
17 196919
18 197718
19 197618
20 198418

About J.E.L. Bishop

J.E.L. Bishop is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 83 papers that have together received 941 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic Properties and Applications (60 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (54 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (15 papers), Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (14 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (13 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (7 papers), Electric Motor Design and Analysis (6 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (774 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (623 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (151 citations), Mechanical Engineering (423 citations) and Structural Biology (5 citations). J.E.L. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Austria. Frequent co-authors include H.A. Davies, J.W. Tucker, W.M. Rainforth, M. Al-Khafaji, Marcus Griffiths, M.R.J. Gibbs, Paul Williams, Siqi Huo, Philip J. Ward and E A Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Journal of Applied Physics and Philosophical Magazine B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact