Jeffrey Newmark

1.8k citations
33 papers · 742 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jeffrey Newmark

31 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers

Jeffrey Newmark
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 729
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 37
  • Molecular Biology 174
  • Oceanography 21
  • Artificial Intelligence 46
Replace Thomas A. Schad with:
Thomas A. Schad United States
P. H. Keys United Kingdom
Sijie Yu United States
Rekha Jain United Kingdom
É. Buchlin France
Y.‐K. Ko United States
Pankaj Kumar United States
Jiayan Yang China
J. P. Wuelser United States
L. Teriaca Germany
Jeffrey Newmark relative to Thomas A. Schad United States Thomas A. Schad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Thomas A. Schad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey Newmark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey Newmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey Newmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey Newmark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey Newmark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey Newmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey Newmark. The network helps show where Jeffrey Newmark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeffrey Newmark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeffrey Newmark Line = papers co-authored together Jeffrey Newmark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001213
2 1999196
3 200079
4 200774
5 199837
6 200122
7 200521
8 200220
9 200217
10 200712
11 20116
12 19905
13
The Radiometric Calibration of the Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope
20024
14 20174
15 20233
16 20073
17 20053
18 20203
19 20193
20 20232

About Jeffrey Newmark

Jeffrey Newmark is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 33 papers that have together received 742 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (26 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (18 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (9 papers), Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics (6 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (3 papers), Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates (3 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3 papers) and Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (729 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (37 citations), Molecular Biology (174 citations), Oceanography (21 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (46 citations). Jeffrey Newmark has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include T. Yokoyama, Ken‐ichi Inoue, Kazuo Akita, Taro Morimoto, W. M. Neupert, J. A. Klimchuk, G. A. Gary, Markus J. Aschwanden, F. Portier-Fozzani and D. M. Alexander. Their work appears in journals such as Solar Physics, The Astrophysical Journal, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, The Astronomical Journal and Advances in Space Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact