Jeff King
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 9
- Oncology 6
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 4
- Co-authors
- Evan L. Breedlove (1 shared paper)Larry J. Leverenz (1 shared paper)Eric A. Nauman (1 shared paper)Kyle O’Keefe (1 shared paper)Jeffrey W. Gilger (1 shared paper)Meghan E. Robinson (1 shared paper)Thomas M. Talavage (1 shared paper)Charles E. Cox (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Surgical Oncology (4 papers)The Breast Journal (3 papers)Modern Law Review (2 papers)Cancer Research (2 papers)The Journal of Urology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
Jeff King
31 papers receiving 731 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Cancer Research 149
- Epidemiology 244
- Law 68
- Emergency Medicine 45
- Neurology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Jeff King
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff King. The network helps show where Jeff King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeff King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 224 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 71 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 21 | |
| 12 | Cost-effectiveness analysis of five different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis. | 1995 | 19 |
| 13 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 19 | Odious Debt: The Terms of the Debate | 2007 | 7 |
| 20 | 2012 | 7 |
About Jeff King
Jeff King is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Surgery, Law and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 796 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (2 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (149 citations), Epidemiology (244 citations), Law (68 citations), Emergency Medicine (45 citations) and Neurology (71 citations). Jeff King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Evan L. Breedlove, Larry J. Leverenz, Eric A. Nauman, Kyle O’Keefe, Jeffrey W. Gilger, Meghan E. Robinson, Thomas M. Talavage, Charles E. Cox, Tammo S. Steenhuis and Robert J. Glass. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgical Oncology, The Breast Journal, Modern Law Review, Cancer Research and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.