Jay Hasbrouck
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Interactive and Immersive Displays
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Papers in
-
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 4
- Usability and User Interface Design 2
-
- Green IT and Sustainability 3
- Co-authors
- Allison Woodruff (2 shared papers)Sally Augustin (1 shared paper)Phoebe Sengers (2 shared papers)Eli Blevis (2 shared papers)Batya Friedman (2 shared papers)Jennifer Mankoff (1 shared paper)Alan Borning (1 shared paper)Susan R. Fussell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Jay Hasbrouck
8 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Human-Computer Interaction 255
- Management of Technology and Innovation 79
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 64
- Computer Science Applications 25
- Museology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Jay Hasbrouck
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Hasbrouck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Hasbrouck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Hasbrouck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Hasbrouck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Hasbrouck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Hasbrouck. The network helps show where Jay Hasbrouck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Jay Hasbrouck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 157 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 144 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 4 | Ethnographic Thinking: From Method to Mindset | 2017 | 7 |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 1 |
About Jay Hasbrouck
Jay Hasbrouck is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Social Psychology, Anthropology and Business and International Management, having authored 10 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (2 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper), Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture (1 paper), Smart Cities and Technologies (1 paper), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (1 paper) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (255 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (79 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (64 citations), Computer Science Applications (25 citations) and Museology (10 citations). Jay Hasbrouck has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Allison Woodruff, Sally Augustin, Phoebe Sengers, Eli Blevis, Batya Friedman, Jennifer Mankoff, Alan Borning, Susan R. Fussell and Lisa P. Nathan. Their work appears in journals such as Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.