Janet Dyson

34 papers receiving 549 citations

Peers

Janet Dyson
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Modeling and Simulation 232
  • Numerical Analysis 139
  • Applied Mathematics 187
  • Mathematical Physics 87
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 117
Replace Renate Schaaf with:
Renate Schaaf United States
Yaping Wu China
Rosanna Villella-Bressan Italy
Manuel Delgado Spain
Yifu Wang China
Peter Y. H. Pang Singapore
Chunhua Ou Canada
Michael Pedersen Denmark
António Suárez Spain
Mostafa Adimy France
Janet Dyson relative to Renate Schaaf United States Renate Schaaf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Renate Schaaf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Dyson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Dyson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Dyson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Dyson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Dyson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Dyson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Dyson. The network helps show where Janet Dyson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Janet Dyson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Dyson Line = papers co-authored together Janet Dyson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197695
2 197661
3 200255
4 200048
5 196731
6 200726
7 197925
8 200023
9 201020
10 200719
11 200418
12 201315
13 197712
14 200412
15 200311
16 197611
17 200511
18 199711
19 200811
20
A maturity structured model of a population of proliferating and quiescent cells
199910

About Janet Dyson

Janet Dyson is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Applied Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Cell Biology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (14 papers), Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (9 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (9 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (6 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (5 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (5 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (5 papers) and Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (232 citations), Numerical Analysis (139 citations), Applied Mathematics (187 citations), Mathematical Physics (87 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (117 citations). Janet Dyson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rosanna Villella-Bressan, Glenn F. Webb, Jack Carr, Howard J. Teas, Stephen A. Gourley, Eva Sánchez, J. Carr, Philip K. Maini, Sunetra Gupta and Pierre Magal. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics, Nonlinear Analysis, Journal of Differential Equations, Differential and Integral Equations and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact