Janet Drew

9 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Janet Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 135
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 124
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 82
  • Clinical Psychology 67
  • Pharmacy 14
Replace Christiaan J.A. Geldof with:
Christiaan J.A. Geldof Netherlands
Beáta Éva Petrovski Norway
Emily Sartini United States
Halime Tuna Çak Esen Türkiye
Laura Tarko United States
Marcella Di Cara Italy
Rosalee C. Shenker United States
Fabio Colonna Italy
Kyle J. Jennette United States
Lisa Whipple Drozdick United States
Janet Drew relative to Christiaan J.A. Geldof Netherlands Christiaan J.A. Geldof's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Christiaan J.A. Geldof · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Drew. The network helps show where Janet Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Drew Line = papers co-authored together Janet Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1995103
2 202049
3 199925
4 196224
5 199521
6 202116
7 202113
8 19939
9 20226
10 19541
11 19601
12 20250

About Janet Drew

Janet Drew is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Rheumatology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments (1 paper), Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions (1 paper), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (1 paper) and Cognitive and psychological constructs research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (135 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (124 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (82 citations), Clinical Psychology (67 citations) and Pharmacy (14 citations). Janet Drew has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include David P. Wacker, Linda Cooper, Jennifer J. McComas, Kimberly Brown, Stephanie Peck, Thomas L. Millard, David M. Richman, Anne Parkinson, Jennifer M. Asmus and Christine Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Health Expectations, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Journal of Personalized Medicine and Behavior Modification.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact