Janet Blake

1.6k citations
24 papers · 340 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Janet Blake

19 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Janet Blake
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Space and Planetary Science 129
  • Archeology 221
  • Museology 47
  • Conservation 36
  • Urban Studies 30
Replace Lucas Lixinski with:
Lucas Lixinski Australia
Michael Brown United States
Lyndel V. Prott Australia
Patrick J. O’Keefe Australia
Federico Lenzerini Italy
Chiara Bonacchi United Kingdom
Benjamin Isakhan Australia
Tolina Loulanski Japan
Françoise Choay France
Zeynep Çelík United States
Janet Blake relative to Lucas Lixinski Australia Lucas Lixinski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lucas Lixinski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Blake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Blake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Blake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Blake. The network helps show where Janet Blake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Janet Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Blake Line = papers co-authored together Janet Blake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000169
2 201555
3 201129
4 199617
5
Museums and safeguarding intangible cultural heritage - facilitating participation and strengthening their function in society.
201811
6 201411
7 200610
8 20179
9 20196
10 20185
11 20154
12 20072
13
Human rights dimensions of gender and intangible cultural heritage
20152
14 20162
15 20172
16 19942
17
Towards a Better Understanding of Community Involvement for Achieving Environmentally Sustainable Development
20081
18 19981
19 20201
20 20231

About Janet Blake

Janet Blake is a scholar working on Archeology, Space and Planetary Science, Political Science and International Relations, Conservation and Law, having authored 24 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (15 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (14 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (3 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (3 papers), Environmental law and policy (3 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (1 paper) and Minority Rights and Languages (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (129 citations), Archeology (221 citations), Museology (47 citations), Conservation (36 citations) and Urban Studies (30 citations). Janet Blake has collaborated with scholars based in Iran, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lucas Lixinski. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cultural Property, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Heritage & Society, Museum International and Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact