Jane Royle

22 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Jane Royle
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 79
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 45
  • General Health Professions 53
  • Computational Mechanics 52
Replace Magdalena Rzewuska with:
Magdalena Rzewuska United Kingdom
Donald B. Giddon United States
Thomas P. Anderson United States
Jose Alejandro Garcia United States
Erdoǵan Günel United States
Hans Bogaardt Australia
Pedro Miguel Forte Portugal
G. S. H. Yeo Singapore
Rajnish K. Gupta United States
Elna M. Nagasako United States
Jane Royle relative to Magdalena Rzewuska United Kingdom Magdalena Rzewuska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Magdalena Rzewuska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Royle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Royle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Royle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Royle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Royle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Royle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Royle. The network helps show where Jane Royle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Royle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Royle Line = papers co-authored together Jane Royle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008164
2 196170
3 200447
4 200945
5 200940
6 197321
7 201420
8 196215
9 201911
10 201510
11 20018
12
Methods for health economic evaluation
20128
13 19775
14 19624
15 20174
16 19612
17 19652
18 20082
19 19611
20 19721

About Jane Royle

Jane Royle is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Mechanical Engineering and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Flow Measurement and Analysis (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1 paper), Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (79 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (45 citations), General Health Professions (53 citations) and Computational Mechanics (52 citations). Jane Royle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nadina Berrice Lincoln, Sandy R. Oliver, Catherine Wilson, M McClelland, D Short, Emilie F. Smithson, Roger C. Goucke, Tracy Jackson, Wayne W. Morriss and Michelle Trevenen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Spinal Cord, Energy, Blood and International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact