Jane Royle

658 citations
24 papers · 479 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Royle

22 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

Jane Royle
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 75
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
  • Computational Mechanics 52
  • Occupational Therapy 8
Replace Hiroshi Haga with:
Hiroshi Haga Japan
Paul Kennedy United States
Kevin Hayes Ireland
M. Cauberghs Belgium
William H. Scott United States
Julien Cohen France
Joseph Walsh United States
Ryan M. Sullivan United States
Simon Sheard United Kingdom
Haije Wind Netherlands
Jane Royle relative to Hiroshi Haga Japan Hiroshi Haga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hiroshi Haga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Royle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Royle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Royle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Royle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Royle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Royle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Royle. The network helps show where Jane Royle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Royle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Royle Line = papers co-authored together Jane Royle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008154
2 196172
3 200445
4 200945
5 200940
6 197320
7 195920
8 201417
9 196216
10 201510
11 20199
12 20217
13 19775
14 20174
15 19624
16 19722
17 19652
18 20082
19 19612
20 20111

About Jane Royle

Jane Royle is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Mechanics of Materials, Computational Mechanics and Physiology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (3 papers), Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications (2 papers), Phase Change Materials Research (2 papers), Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems (2 papers), Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (2 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (2 papers), Flow Measurement and Analysis (2 papers) and Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (75 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (54 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations), Computational Mechanics (52 citations) and Occupational Therapy (8 citations). Jane Royle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nadina B. Lincoln, Sandy Oliver, Catherine Wilson, Paul Kennedy, M McClelland, D Short, Emilie F. Smithson, Hoon Kiat Ng, Roger Goucke and Tracy Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Spinal Cord, Blood, World Journal of Surgery and Energy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact