Jane Philips

634 citations
3 papers · 21 · h-index 2

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Philips

2 papers receiving 20 citations

Peers

Jane Philips
Comparison fields: 5 of 10
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 10
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 4
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 17
  • Clinical Psychology 6
  • General Health Professions 6
Replace Nicolas Govea with:
Nicolas Govea United States
Laura Hoofring United States
Choo Hwee Poi Singapore
Quách Thanh Khánh Vietnam
Rebecca Rendleman United States
Béatrice Jenni‐Moser Switzerland
Stéphanie Gelinotte France
Lisa Buckingham Australia
François Bougerol France
Jean-Pierre Eraldi France
Jane Philips relative to Nicolas Govea United States Nicolas Govea's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nicolas Govea · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Philips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Philips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Philips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Philips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Philips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Philips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Philips. The network helps show where Jane Philips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jane Philips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Philips Line = papers co-authored together Jane Philips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
#Work
1 201417
2 20224
3 20230

About Jane Philips

Jane Philips is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Physiology, having authored 3 papers that have together received 21 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Nutrition and Health in Aging (1 paper) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (10 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (4 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (17 citations), Clinical Psychology (6 citations) and General Health Professions (6 citations). Jane Philips has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Peter Saul, Katherine Clark, Malcolm Green, Phillip J. Newton, Peter S. Macdonald, Patricia M. Davidson, Caleb Ferguson, Sungwon Chang, Roslyn Prichard and Ariesta Milanti. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Cancer Nursing and Australian Health Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact