Jane Peck

474 citations
7 papers · 324 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Peck

7 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Jane Peck
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Human-Computer Interaction 109
  • Information Systems and Management 80
  • Communication 51
  • Computer Science Applications 31
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 36
Replace Jami Carroll with:
Jami Carroll Australia
Stephanie Rosenbaum United States
Huatong Sun United States
Imed Boughzala France
Lynne Dunckley United Kingdom
Mads Bødker Denmark
Alanah Mitchell United States
Hyosun Kwon South Korea
Emilie W. Gould United States
Elena Rocco United States
Jane Peck relative to Jami Carroll Australia Jami Carroll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jami Carroll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Peck. The network helps show where Jane Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jane Peck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Peck Line = papers co-authored together Jane Peck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
A Field Study of Perceptions and Use of Mobile Telephones by 16 to 22 Year Olds
2002116
2 200389
3
IDENTITY, POWER AND FRAGMENTATION IN CYBERSPACE: TECHNOLOGY APPROPRIATION BY YOUNG PEOPLE
200160
4 200253
5
Young People, Mobile Technology and the Task Artefact Cycle
20014
6
Managing Innovation in Scenario-Based Design
20021
7 20021

About Jane Peck

Jane Peck is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Human-Computer Interaction, Communication and Information Systems and Management, having authored 7 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Systems Theories and Implementation (5 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Digital Marketing and Social Media (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (109 citations), Information Systems and Management (80 citations), Communication (51 citations), Computer Science Applications (31 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (36 citations). Jane Peck has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jennie Carroll, Steve Howard, John Murphy, Frank Vetere and John A. Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems and AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact