Jane Johnson

1.3k citations
67 papers · 943 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Johnson

64 papers receiving 891 citations

Peers

Jane Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Small Animals 157
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 274
  • Speech and Hearing 62
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 89
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 14
Replace Abigail Woods with:
Abigail Woods United Kingdom
Barbara Natterson-Horowitz United States
Jacqueline Martina Cardwell United Kingdom
Audrey Ruple United States
Susan Rhind United Kingdom
Peter van Beukelen Netherlands
Anne J. Carter United Kingdom
Melissa M. Upjohn United Kingdom
Robert F. Teclaw United States
Sara Platto China
Jane Johnson relative to Abigail Woods United Kingdom Abigail Woods's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Abigail Woods · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Johnson. The network helps show where Jane Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Jane Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015131
2 201686
3 201152
4 197836
5 201934
6 201730
7 201930
8 201930
9 201526
10 201322
11 201722
12 201420
13 201019
14 202019
15 201919
16 201618
17 201816
18 202016
19 201716
20 201615

About Jane Johnson

Jane Johnson is a scholar working on Small Animals, Speech and Hearing, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 67 papers that have together received 943 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (13 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (11 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (9 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (9 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (9 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (8 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (6 papers) and Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (157 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (274 citations), Speech and Hearing (62 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (89 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (14 citations). Jane Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Chris Degeling, Gwendolyn L. Gilbert, Wendy Rogers, Andrew Wilson, Michael Ward, Ian Kerridge, Cameron L Stewart, Debra L. Hickman, Robert K. Shepherd and Katrina Hutchison. Their work appears in journals such as Animals, Journal of Medical Ethics, BMC Medical Ethics, The American Journal of Bioethics and American Journal of Roentgenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact