Jane Glanzer

9.8k citations
63 papers · 7.3k · 14 hit papers · h-index 33

Impact in

    • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
    • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
    • Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
    • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
    • Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena

Papers in

    • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 62
    • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 24
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 15
    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 9
    • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements 13

Jane Glanzer

58 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Jane Glanzer's Hit Papers

GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265 M ⊙ 2025 · 78 citations
780+2+4Years since publication2505007501000

Peers

Jane Glanzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 6.7k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.8k
  • Oceanography 812
  • Geophysics 707
  • Instrumentation 85
Replace Verónica Villa-Ortega with:
Verónica Villa-Ortega United States
Priyanka Giri United States
Deborah Ferguson United States
I. J. Hollows United States
Przemysław Figura United States
Kiet Pham United States
J. D. Callaghan United States
Ian Macmillan United States
Shania Nichols United States
Enzo Nicolás Tapia San Martín United States
Jane Glanzer relative to Verónica Villa-Ortega United States Verónica Villa-Ortega's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Verónica Villa-Ortega · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Glanzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Glanzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Glanzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Glanzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Glanzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Glanzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Glanzer. The network helps show where Jane Glanzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Jane Glanzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Glanzer Line = papers co-authored together Jane Glanzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M ⊙
Hit paper breakdown →
20201022
2
Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO–Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog
Hit paper breakdown →
2021730
3
Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3
Hit paper breakdown →
2023729
4
Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog
Hit paper breakdown →
2021604
5
Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star-Black Hole Coalescences
Hit paper breakdown →
2021538
6
GW190412: Observation of a binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses
Hit paper breakdown →
2020508
7
GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run
Hit paper breakdown →
2024383
8
GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object
Hit paper breakdown →
2020370
9
Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run
Hit paper breakdown →
2021339
10
Open Data from the Third Observing Run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO
Hit paper breakdown →
2023243
11 2021140
12
Observation of Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 2.5–4.5 M ⊙ Compact Object and a Neutron Star
Hit paper breakdown →
2024139
13 2021123
14 202387
15 202279
16
GW231123: A Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190–265 M ⊙
Hit paper breakdown →
202578
17 202262
18 202260
19 202159
20 202259

About Jane Glanzer

Jane Glanzer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Geophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Ocean Engineering, having authored 63 papers that have together received 7.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (62 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (24 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (15 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (13 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (9 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (4 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (6.7k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.8k citations), Oceanography (812 citations), Geophysics (707 citations) and Instrumentation (85 citations). Jane Glanzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include S. Soni, Gabriela Gonzalez, Anamaria Effler and Arnaud Pele. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, The Astrophysical Journal, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Physical Review Letters and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact