Jane Farmer

4.4k citations
181 papers · 3.4k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Farmer

170 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Jane Farmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Emergency Medical Services 435
  • General Health Professions 1.1k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 391
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 252
  • Health 201
Replace Jane Elizabeth Mills with:
Jane Elizabeth Mills Australia
Amanda J. Kenny Australia
Nancy Carter Canada
Irene Korstjens Netherlands
Jennifer Blythe Canada
Alba DiCenso Canada
Di McIntyre South Africa
Barbara DiCicco‐Bloom United States
K. Bruce Newbold Canada
Lisa Bourke Australia
Jane Farmer relative to Jane Elizabeth Mills Australia Jane Elizabeth Mills's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.1×
Jane Elizabeth Mills · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Farmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Farmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Farmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Farmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Farmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Farmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Farmer. The network helps show where Jane Farmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Farmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Farmer Line = papers co-authored together Jane Farmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 181 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013129
2 2014103
3 201596
4 201489
5 201487
6 200580
7 200573
8 200970
9 201868
10 200366
11 200966
12 201566
13 201666
14 201953
15 200751
16
Rural deprivation: reflecting reality.
200150
17 200850
18 200949
19 200648
20 200947

About Jane Farmer

Jane Farmer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Management of Technology and Innovation, Emergency Medical Services, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 181 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Community Health and Development (23 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (20 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (19 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (13 papers), Rural development and sustainability (12 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (11 papers), Library Science and Information (8 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (435 citations), General Health Professions (1.1k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (391 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (252 citations) and Health (201 citations). Jane Farmer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Artur Steiner, Amanda J. Kenny, Sarah‐Anne Muñoz, Virginia Dickson‐Swift, Amy Nimegeer, Judy Taylor, Lisa Iversen, Sue Kilpatrick, Nerida Hyett and Mark G. Gussy. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Rural Health, Health & Place, Social Science & Medicine, BMC Health Services Research and Journal of Rural Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact