Jane E. Crowell
Impact in
- Structural Biology top 5%
- Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Neurology top 10%
- Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Anthonie Van Harreveld (2 shared papers)S. K. Malhotra (1 shared paper)Guglielmo Borgia (7 shared papers)Neal S. Penneys (1 shared paper)Marcello Piazza (2 shared papers)Salvatore Nappa (3 shared papers)Gianfranco Vallone (1 shared paper)Antonietta Lambiase (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Mycoses (2 papers)The Anatomical Record (1 paper)European Journal of Epidemiology (1 paper)Hepatology (1 paper)The Journal of Cell Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane E. Crowell
10 papers receiving 650 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Structural Biology 71
- Neurology 135
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 207
- Developmental Neuroscience 39
- Cell Biology 95
Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Crowell
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Crowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Crowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Crowell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Crowell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Crowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Crowell. The network helps show where Jane E. Crowell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Crowell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1965 | 382 | |
| 2 | 1964 | 328 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 12 | |
| 4 | Aloe vera does not affect cutaneous erythema and blood flow following ultraviolet B exposure. | 1989 | 8 |
| 5 | 1985 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 1 |
About Jane E. Crowell
Jane E. Crowell is a scholar working on Toxicology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Biochemistry, Parasitology and Hepatology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (1 paper), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (1 paper), Heat shock proteins research (1 paper), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (1 paper), Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures (1 paper), Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (1 paper) and Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (71 citations), Neurology (135 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (207 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (39 citations) and Cell Biology (95 citations). Jane E. Crowell has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthonie Van Harreveld, S. K. Malhotra, Guglielmo Borgia, Neal S. Penneys, Marcello Piazza, Salvatore Nappa, Gianfranco Vallone, Antonietta Lambiase, Raimondo Cerini and Michele Milano. Their work appears in journals such as Mycoses, The Anatomical Record, European Journal of Epidemiology, Hepatology and The Journal of Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.