Jane E. Booth

22 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers

Jane E. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 180
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 87
  • Clinical Psychology 89
  • Reproductive Medicine 33
Replace Tomasz Hanć with:
Tomasz Hanć Poland
William D. Boyd Ireland
David V. Sheslow United States
John Baranoff Australia
Bárbara Romero Germany
James P. Mayo United States
Anna‐Sophie Rommel United States
James B. Hoelzle United States
Kenzo Denda Japan
Allison S. Evans United States
Jane E. Booth relative to Tomasz Hanć Poland Tomasz Hanć's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tomasz Hanć · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Booth. The network helps show where Jane E. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200282
2 200670
3 200758
4 201347
5 199942
6 202136
7 202135
8 200530
9 201217
10 202013
11 202310
12 20017
13 20206
14 20236
15 20215
16 19804
17
Legal issues facing the non-traditional family
19943
18 20213
19 19993
20 20252

About Jane E. Booth

Jane E. Booth is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (180 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (70 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (87 citations), Clinical Psychology (89 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (33 citations). Jane E. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Caryn L. Carlson, Will H. Canu, Don M. Tucker, Jamie L. Benham, Ronald J. Sigal, Doreen M. Rabi, Lisa M. Brown, John A. Schinka, James A. Mortimer and Amy R. Borenstein. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Diabetes, Clinical Endocrinology, Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, Diabetic Medicine and Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact