Jane de Lemos
Impact in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 10%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Papers in
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders 2
-
- Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units 3
- Co-authors
- Dean R. Chittock (5 shared papers)Martin Tweeddale (2 shared papers)Peter Loewen (8 shared papers)Teresa Lee (1 shared paper)Sean K Gorman (2 shared papers)Stephen Ho (1 shared paper)Richard S Slavik (2 shared papers)Richard K. Simons (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Jane de Lemos
19 papers receiving 248 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 68
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 37
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 52
- Internal Medicine 24
- Developmental Neuroscience 22
Countries citing papers authored by Jane de Lemos
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane de Lemos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane de Lemos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane de Lemos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane de Lemos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane de Lemos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane de Lemos. The network helps show where Jane de Lemos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane de Lemos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 1 |
About Jane de Lemos
Jane de Lemos is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 19 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (1 paper) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (68 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (37 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (52 citations), Internal Medicine (24 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (22 citations). Jane de Lemos has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Portugal and China. Frequent co-authors include Dean R. Chittock, Martin Tweeddale, Peter Loewen, Teresa Lee, Sean K Gorman, Stephen Ho, Richard S Slavik, Richard K. Simons, Peter Wing and Juan J. Ronco. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Canadian Journal of Diabetes, Pharmacy Practice and Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.