Jane D. Chaplin
Impact in
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
-
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 2
- Classics 1
- Byzantine Studies and History 1
- Journals
- Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Jane D. Chaplin
1 paper receiving 41 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 13
- Anthropology 34
- Classics 8
- Archeology 17
- Religious studies 7
- History 9
Countries citing papers authored by Jane D. Chaplin
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane D. Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane D. Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane D. Chaplin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane D. Chaplin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane D. Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane D. Chaplin. The network helps show where Jane D. Chaplin may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
About Jane D. Chaplin
Jane D. Chaplin is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 2 papers that have together received 49 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (34 citations), Classics (8 citations), Archeology (17 citations), Religious studies (7 citations) and History (9 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.